WARNER v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, POLICE PENSION FUND, 528 F.2d 505 (5th Cir. 1976)

WILLIAM J. WARNER, JR., ET AL., ETC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE POLICE PENSION FUND OF THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, AND ITS MEMBERS, CAPT. ALVIN H. RANKIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

No. 74-2303.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 27, 1976.

Henry L. Klein, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Lamar Richardson, Jr., Metairie, La., for John Suitt.

Richard A. Dowling, Dorothy D. Wolbrette, Bueker F. Amann, Asst. City Atty., New Orleans, La., for Police Pension.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., Philip D. Lorio, III, Asst. City Atty., New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE, WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] This appeal presents the same jurisdictional issues as are involved in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, 5 Cir. 1976, 528 F.2d 499, today decided. [2] The trial court’s order dismissing the complaint for want of § 1983 jurisdiction was proper for the reasons stated by us i Muzquiz. [3] Affirmed. [4] JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge (dissenting and concurring in part). [5] I dissent in part and concur in part as set forth in my opinion in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, 5 Cir. 1976, 528 F.2d 499, decided this day. [6] TUTTLE, Circuit Judge, with whom WISDOM, GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges, join (dissenting). [7] I dissent from the decision in this case on the grounds stated by me in the dissent in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, et al.,
5 Cir. 1976, 528 F.2d 499, announced this day. [8] THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part). [9] I concur in part and dissent in part in accordance with the views set forth in my partial concurrence and partial dissent i Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio,

Page 506

528 F.2d 499 (5 Cir. 1976), decided this day.

[10] GODBOLD, Circuit Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part). [11] I dissent in part and concur in part as set forth in my opinion in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, 528 F.2d 499 [No. 74-3177] (CA 5, 1976), decided this day.
jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 528 F.2d 505

Recent Posts

SOUTH GWINNETT VENTURE v. PRUITT, 491 F.2d 5 (1974)

491 F.2d 5 (1974) SOUTH GWINNETT VENTURE, a Partnership composed of South Gwinnett Apartments, Inc.,…

1 year ago

UNITED STATES v. DUNCAN, 919 F.2d 981 (5th Cir. 1990)

919 F.2d 981 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel DUNCAN, Jr., Grace Duncan,…

3 years ago

TEST MASTERS EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. v. SINGH, 428 F.3d (5th Cir. 2005)

428 F.3d 559 (2005) TEST MASTERS EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.; Vivek Israni, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Robin SINGH,…

3 years ago

IN RE COASTAL PLAINS, INC., 179 F.3d 197 (5th Cir. 1999)

179 F.3d 197 (1999) In The Matter of: COASTAL PLAINS, INC., Debtor. Browning Manufacturing, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,…

3 years ago

UNITED STATES v. CARRILLO, 981 F.2d 772 (5th Cir. 1993)

981 F.2d 772 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Augustin Mora CARRILLO, Defendant-Appellant. No.…

3 years ago

DURHAM v. FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, 385 F.2d 366 (1967)

385 F.2d 366 (1967) Clayton E. DURHAM, Appellant, v. FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee.…

4 years ago