U.S. v. YOUNG, 251 Fed.Appx. 952 (5th Cir. 2007)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Walter Devon-Istashma YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-21006, Conference Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 25, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Page 953

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 4:05-CR-359-5.

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:[*]

[*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Walter Devon-Istashma Young appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 135-month sentence for aiding and abetting bank robbery and use of a firearm during a crime of violence. Young contends that his sentence is unreasonable because this court’s post-Booker[1] rulings have effectively rein-stated the mandatory sentencing guideline regime condemned i Booker. This argument is foreclosed. See Rita v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

[1] United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 62 1 (2005).