U.S. v. STONE, 235 Fed.Appx. 989 (5th Cir. 2007)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Philip Brazil STONE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50578, Summary Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
August 22, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Darren Obenoskey, Mosley Obenoskey, Waco, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Page 990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 6:05-CR-219-2.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:[*]

[*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

The attorney appointed to represent Philip Brazil Stone has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant t Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Stone has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH Cm. R. 42.2.