U.S. v. LOLLEY, 422 Fed.Appx. 360 (5th Cir. 2011)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Curtis Dale LOLLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30738 Conference Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 19, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Josette Louise Cassiere, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Earl M. Campbell, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Betty Lee Marak, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Curtis Dale Lolley, Minden, LA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, USDC No. 5:09-CR-339-1.

Page 361

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:[*]

[*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Curtis Dale Lolley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lolley has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.