U.S. v. HAMMER, 373 Fed.Appx. 517 (5th Cir. 2010)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rodney HAMMER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10649 Conference Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 20, 2010.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John W. Stickels, Stickels Associates, P.C., Arlington, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 4:09-CR-3-8.

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:[*]

[*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH Cm. R. 47.5.4.

The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Hammer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance wit Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hammer has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.