U.S. v. GAMEZ, 253 Fed.Appx. 437 (5th Cir. 2007)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mario Joel GAMEZ, also known as Mario Gomez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10445 Conference Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 8, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Christopher R. Wolfe, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Raymond J. Rodgers, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 4:06-CR-166-ALL.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:[*]

[*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario Joel Gamez presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.