U.S. v. CRUZ-TELLEZ, 423 Fed.Appx. 491 (5th Cir. 2011)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Argenis DE LA CRUZ-TELLEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10941 Summary Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 29, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Susan Cowger, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William Reynolds Biggs, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charles M. Bleil, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 3:10-CR-81-1.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:[*]

[*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Argenis De La Cruz-Tellez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flares, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). De La Cruz-Tellez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

Page 492

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.