U.S. v. CORONA-CAMPOS, 230 Fed.Appx. 410 (5th Cir. 2007)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam CORONA-CAMPOS, also known as Raul Campos, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-51388 Conference Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 6, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3.-06-CR-869-ALL.

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:[*]

[*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Adam Corona-Campos raises arguments that are foreclosed b Almendarez-Torres

Page 411

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.