No. 21324.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 9, 1964.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Charles B. Fulton, Judge.
M.H. Rosenhouse, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., William A. Meadows, Jr., U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., J. Edward Shillingburg, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The facts from which this controversy arose, and the principles applied by the district court in reaching its conclusion, are set forth in its opinion. United States v. Harris, 223 F. Supp. 309. We agree with the conclusion and are in accord with the principles announced in the opinion. The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Page 859
491 F.2d 5 (1974) SOUTH GWINNETT VENTURE, a Partnership composed of South Gwinnett Apartments, Inc.,…
919 F.2d 981 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel DUNCAN, Jr., Grace Duncan,…
428 F.3d 559 (2005) TEST MASTERS EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.; Vivek Israni, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Robin SINGH,…
179 F.3d 197 (1999) In The Matter of: COASTAL PLAINS, INC., Debtor. Browning Manufacturing, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,…
981 F.2d 772 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Augustin Mora CARRILLO, Defendant-Appellant. No.…
385 F.2d 366 (1967) Clayton E. DURHAM, Appellant, v. FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee.…