U.S. v. RAMIREZ, 407 Fed.Appx. 818 (5th Cir. 2011)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Allen RAMIREZ, also known as Necio, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10361 Summary Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 7, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Scott A.C. Meisler, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Seth Kretzer, Law Offices of Seth Kretzer, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 5:09-CR-4-4.

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:[*]

[*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR, R. 47.5.4.

The attorney appointed to represent Robert Allen Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ramirez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.